We are committed to advancing knowledge and encouraging scholarly dialogue across a wide range of disciplines. We provide a trusted platform for sharing high-quality research and original ideas, reflecting our dedication to academic excellence and intellectual growth.



Dedicated to rigorous scholarship, author rights retention, and global research discoverability.

Double blind peer-review by qualified reviewers across fields to ensure impartial, constructive evaluation.
All our Journals are free to read worldwide the moment it is published under CC-BY 4.0 licence.
Every published paper is assigned a DOI from Crossref, ensuring permanent citation links and metadata harvesting.
Open to research across the Social sciences, humanities, and allied fields on a continuous rolling basis.
To sustain peer review management, copyediting, Crossref DOI registration, and global digital preservation, a modest single publication fee applies.
Waivers and Discounts: We consider waiver or discount requests on a case-by-case basis, particularly for authors facing financial hardship and from developing countries. Requests should be made to the editorial office at the point of submission.
Peer-reviewed academic journals across the arts, humanities, political studies, critical perspectives, and multidisciplinary research.
Arts & HumanitiesCritical inquiry, cultural philosophy, historical studies, literary criticism, and creative theoretical discourses.
MultidisciplinaryCross-disciplinary research, methodological innovation, and original scholarship bridging social sciences, humanities, and empirical sciences.
Critical PerspectivesPeer-reviewed critical scholarship and interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives.
Political StudiesScholarly analysis of political theory, public policy, governance systems, international relations, and civic institutions.
A clear, transparent six-stage editorial workflow from initial submission to global online publication.
Submit your manuscript and author details through the online submission form. Initial submission is completely free with no fee required to begin review.
Qualified reviewers review your paper and return a decision. All evaluations are conducted via double-anonymised assessment to guarantee fairness and rigour.
On acceptance, confirm your details and complete the copyright form. Authors retain full copyright under Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0).
Complete any applicable publication charge (₦30,000 for Nigerian authors / US $90 for foreign authors). Eligible waivers are applied as approved.
Your paper is published online with a permanent Crossref DOI assigned, downloadable PDF, and automated distribution to indexing databases.
All our Journals are published online only. Immediate open access allows researchers, practitioners, and students worldwide to access your work unrestricted.
This article examines the relationship between gender roles and the failure of marriage in Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, employing feminism and existentialism as complementary theoretical frameworks. Drawing particularly on Simone de Beauvoir’s conception of woman as “Other” and her distinction between immanence and transcendence, Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity, and Jean-Paul Sartre’s concepts of freedom, choice, responsibility, and bad faith, the study argues that Ibsen presents marriage as a social institution shaped by unequal gender expectations, economic dependence, patriarchal authority, and the performance of respectability. Through close textual analysis of dialogue, characterisation, symbolism, dramatic structure, and domestic space, the article demonstrates that Nora Helmer’s apparently comfortable marriage depends upon her performance as obedient wife, devoted mother, attractive companion, and dependent consumer, while Torvald Helmer performs the complementary roles of provider, protector, moral authority, and patriarchal husband. The crisis surrounding Nora’s secret loan and forgery exposes the fragility of these performances and reveals the absence of genuine mutual recognition within the marriage. Nora’s eventual decision to leave her husband and children constitutes an attempt to move from socially prescribed identity towards autonomous self-definition. Torvald’s inability to recognise this emerging self also exposes the restrictive consequences of patriarchal masculinity. The article concludes that the Helmer marriage fails not simply because of Nora’s secret but because its foundation is inequality rather than reciprocal recognition. Ibsen’s drama consequently raises enduring questions about whether marriage can remain meaningful when the identities of its participants are determined more by social expectations than by freely negotiated human relationships.

Connecting your published scholarship to worldwide bibliographic databases, citation networks, and open research search engines.
Comprehensive academic search & citation metrics
Persistent DOIs & machine-readable metadata
Global open knowledge graph & bibliometrics
Scientific literature automated indexing crawler
AI-driven semantic paper and citation explorer
Scholarly literature & open patent mapping
Linked research insights, citations & grants
Join the scholars who trust our Journals for rigorous, open-access, peer-reviewed publication. Share your research with a community committed to knowledge and excellence.